Search found 7 matches
- Author
- Message
- 04 Jan 2014, 14:57
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.243
- Replies: 195
- Views: 52834
Re: TES Skyrim 0.243
Tested, same as official 0.243
- 04 Jan 2014, 03:43
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.243
- Replies: 195
- Views: 52834
Re: TES Skyrim 0.243
Tested, same results
Thank you Boris
Thank you Boris
- 04 Jan 2014, 00:15
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.243
- Replies: 195
- Views: 52834
Re: TES Skyrim 0.243
@skysan4298
Try with the 0.236 binaries, you'll probably see a huge difference at 1.5
Try with the 0.236 binaries, you'll probably see a huge difference at 1.5
- 03 Jan 2014, 23:22
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.243
- Replies: 195
- Views: 52834
Re: TES Skyrim 0.243
Just to confirm, waves aplitude affect waves, not only water level in 0.243? Caching disabled give the same result as when enabled? If both true, then may be samplers 10-12 have forced srgbtexture flag even if i disabling it, basically samplers works with texture data computed as pow(texture, 2.2)....
- 03 Jan 2014, 22:53
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.243
- Replies: 195
- Views: 52834
Re: TES Skyrim 0.243
Just tested and I get the same. 0.243 looks flat with an HD7970 and 13.12WHQL drivers. I didn't notice it because I have skipped several versions, jumped straight from v0.22x to v0.243, so I didn't get to try v0.236. Seems like it's an AMD issue again. EDIT: @Jafin16 I see a lot of difference betwee...
- 23 Aug 2013, 00:49
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.208
- Replies: 50
- Views: 14530
Re: TES Skyrim 0.208
@Boris If I understand the problem correctly, the code in 0.201 is incorrect, and new, correct code doesn't work right because there is a bug in DX, and it doesn't report the correct vram amount in cards with 4GB or more. If what I said is correct I'd keep the new correct code. I don't know how hard...
- 21 Aug 2013, 18:55
- Forum: Download
- Topic: TES Skyrim 0.206
- Replies: 116
- Views: 24489
Re: TES Skyrim 0.206
I haven't had any issues with 0.206, but I did the test anyway (the last one):
video (local)-> -1.092.444.160
video (non-local)-> 1.092.378.624
texture-> -65.536
This is with an HD7970 3GB, I can't add a signature with my specs yet
video (local)-> -1.092.444.160
video (non-local)-> 1.092.378.624
texture-> -65.536
This is with an HD7970 3GB, I can't add a signature with my specs yet