TES Skyrim

[theradikal11]

[midhras]

Some hair parts drawed as alpha transparent object at the end of rendering, these objects can't have ssao (it's very slow for transparencity) and mixing filter between transparent and non transparent objects do the same "business" to hair as with water. I don't think that will be any fix from me, for water may be, but not for hairs.

But was there a change in the way SSAO works? I mean previous to .110 I never had a problem with the alpha transparent parts of hair. The problem first appeared with I think .110 or .111. I can't go back to earlier versions like .103 because advanced shadows and complex SSIL are fantastic. But the hair thing is a pity. Not complaining though. I hope someone finds a solution for this, but I don't think anyone will soon be able to...

There isn't a way to implement the .103 SSAO and the cSSIL and advanced shadows of KAGE, right Boris?


@theradikal11: the way those smoldering logs and the fire sparks look in your configs is fantastic.

[CruNcher]

Some hair parts drawed as alpha transparent object at the end of rendering, these objects can't have ssao (it's very slow for transparencity) and mixing filter between transparent and non transparent objects do the same "business" to hair as with water. I don't think that will be any fix from me, for water may be, but not for hairs.

Funny you mention this the first thing after yesterday installing the GTX 460 and testing SSAO was the vanishing of beard on the character Skin and many scars and details, it makes the actor look really younger without even modding.

Though this change of appearance isn't really wanted i guess you either eat it or leave SSAO, though the effect on the background especially blows



No SSAO:



ENB SSAO:



Though their is also the solution to backup to Nvidias SSAO i guess that's my way to go, for now

Nvidia SSAO:

[dpeasant]

I beg you not to post uncomp[ressed .PNG pics, its 3mb for small 1 024px × 576px picture. Its almsot impossible to navigate the thread with them loading so slow.

[CruNcher]

I beg you not to post uncomp[ressed .PNG pics, its 3mb for small 1 024px × 576px picture. Its almsot impossible to navigate the thread with them loading so slow.

Huh what for a Browser you are using that slows down scrolling @ loading ?

[dpeasant]

I beg you not to post uncomp[ressed .PNG pics, its 3mb for small 1 024px × 576px picture. Its almsot impossible to navigate the thread with them loading so slow.

Huh what for a Browser you are using that slows down scrolling @ loading ?

What browser has to do with limited adsl internet access channel?

[CruNcher]

I beg you not to post uncomp[ressed .PNG pics, its 3mb for small 1 024px × 576px picture. Its almsot impossible to navigate the thread with them loading so slow.

Huh what for a Browser you are using that slows down scrolling @ loading ?

What browser has to do with limited adsl internet access channel?

The compression for that one was low due to the higher details as you can see some are as small as 800 kb only here and there they get this big if you keep a lot of details (that don't vanish in the post pro of ENB).

Is there a host that automaticaly compresses PNGs to JPGs, though i guess the chances are higher to find a host that does bmp->jpg than png->jpg i guess

Framework conversion i hate it for Video and i hate it for Pictures

[midhras]

Flickr.

[CruNcher]

@midhras

thx im looking though for others but meeting dpeasant and my requirements seem indeed hard to combine most imagehoster lack in one category or another either they don't allow conversion or they have so gruesome interfaces which just would require 2 simple boxes in my case

No more uncompressed pics from me

[DogStar]

:|