TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17551
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
You may also try assign affinity mask of game process to physical cores only, if cpu have hyper-threading.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 80
- Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 23:06
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Arh ok ill turn HT off and give that a go cheers.
_________________
Win 10 64, Intel i7 5820K @ 4.2, GTX 970 4gig, 16 gb DDR 4 ram, Asus Xonar D2X, dual Acer T232HL IPS LED Monitors, One 27" IIyamma pro X82783HSU, 2 TB HD + 3x 128gb + 1x 250gb+ 1 500gb SD drives.
Win 10 64, Intel i7 5820K @ 4.2, GTX 970 4gig, 16 gb DDR 4 ram, Asus Xonar D2X, dual Acer T232HL IPS LED Monitors, One 27" IIyamma pro X82783HSU, 2 TB HD + 3x 128gb + 1x 250gb+ 1 500gb SD drives.
-
Offline
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 12 Dec 2013, 15:11
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Well, I tried a very script heavy save and got to a point where any fast travel would have a 100% crash ratio. Set DataSyncMode from 0 to 1, with PriorityMode still on 0 and it loaded fine. So it works! You knew that already otherwise you wouldn't have released it, but I'm not sure what else to report in the thread. I'll do some more testing on the script heavy save, but it's nice something is being done to increase stability.
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 18:55
- Location: Scotland
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Played for an hour or two with PriorityMode=1 & DataSync=0. Didn't notice any difference. Going to play with PriorityMode=2 later.
_________________
Intel i7 6700k | AMD Vega 56 8GB | 2x16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz | Windows 7 64bit | Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | Asus z170 Pro Gaming
Intel i7 6700k | AMD Vega 56 8GB | 2x16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz | Windows 7 64bit | Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | Asus z170 Pro Gaming
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17551
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Is it just me with slow downclocked videocard or Skyrim really have much higher performance with certain fov setting in some places? For example interior which i tested with 71 fov vs 70 have about 20% higher fps, exteriors kinda too.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 18:55
- Location: Scotland
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
I only fuddled with the FoV back when I had a 6670 ddr3, but I found that going down from 70 to 65 (Morrowind's FoV) kept me from dipping below 40fps (didn't have an ENB back then, no graphical mods either). With 70, I'd often drop into the high teens.ENBSeries wrote:Is it just me with slow downclocked videocard or Skyrim really have much higher performance with certain fov setting in some places? For example interior which i tested with 71 fov vs 70 have about 20% higher fps, exteriors kinda too.
Haven't been bothered to change the FoV. I'll give it a try myself later.
_________________
Intel i7 6700k | AMD Vega 56 8GB | 2x16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz | Windows 7 64bit | Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | Asus z170 Pro Gaming
Intel i7 6700k | AMD Vega 56 8GB | 2x16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz | Windows 7 64bit | Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | Asus z170 Pro Gaming
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 30 May 2012, 15:40
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Minimal testing so far and only with the default settings for Threads. Loads work great so far but I did have my game hang on me once requiring Task Manager to stop the process.
-
Offline
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 12 Dec 2013, 15:11
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
I always thought it had to do with the occlusion culling but I've been using really big FoV changes like to 25 or something for screenshots. It sounds a bit strange you'd get 20% higher FPS going from 71 to 70.ENBSeries wrote:Is it just me with slow downclocked videocard or Skyrim really have much higher performance with certain fov setting in some places? For example interior which i tested with 71 fov vs 70 have about 20% higher fps, exteriors kinda too.
-
Offline
- Posts: 77
- Joined: 18 Jan 2013, 17:01
- Location: Switzerland
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
I can confirm that. With different fov, performance differences may be quite noticeable.
in regards of SLI: I use two gtx 980 with 4gb vram each. in the comments section, people said, that the skyrim engine is not using all the vram (what I can confirm here too, more stuttering (due to vram), than with single card). Can anyone suggest any SLI profiles that are working nicely?
And regarding Windows 10: MS does not offer a way to get windows 7, if I previously used 8.1, then upgraded to 10, right?
This whole windows & graphics driver things are so fucked up. :c
in regards of SLI: I use two gtx 980 with 4gb vram each. in the comments section, people said, that the skyrim engine is not using all the vram (what I can confirm here too, more stuttering (due to vram), than with single card). Can anyone suggest any SLI profiles that are working nicely?
And regarding Windows 10: MS does not offer a way to get windows 7, if I previously used 8.1, then upgraded to 10, right?
This whole windows & graphics driver things are so fucked up. :c
-
Offline
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 06 Aug 2013, 05:04
Re: TES Skyrim 0.303 ENBoost
Boris, I was wondering if the SKSE plugin "One Tweak" would conflict with the new ENBoost fixes. (Here is a link to the mod I am talking about: http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/40706/? )
I ask because OneTweak has a feature that supposedly manages the process priority of Skyrim. Would this conflict with the PriorityMode option in ENBoost v6? What exactly does the PriorityMode control?
Thanks.
I ask because OneTweak has a feature that supposedly manages the process priority of Skyrim. Would this conflict with the PriorityMode option in ENBoost v6? What exactly does the PriorityMode control?
Thanks.