TES Skyrim 0.198
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
Ok good to know and thanks for the fast response.
-
Offline
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 19:22
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
Ok Boris, I'm looking into other reasons for my CTDs since VRAM overusage isn't the cause, but I'd still like to know if it would be worth it to upgrade from EVGA GTX 670 FTW 2GB to a 4GB version, considering I'd still like to add several more mods and I'm already hitting my max at 2GB.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17553
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
tgpomy
I don't think that only for this game you need additional 2 gb at very much cost. Whatever you buy, will not be enough memory ever, because of mods. Better wait till i make version for x64 systems, it will have some stuttering when cells loading, but it's much better and cheaper solution which really good for future of this game.
I don't think that only for this game you need additional 2 gb at very much cost. Whatever you buy, will not be enough memory ever, because of mods. Better wait till i make version for x64 systems, it will have some stuttering when cells loading, but it's much better and cheaper solution which really good for future of this game.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
I did a similar upgrade when my GTX 670 2gb fried on me. I had the MSI GeForce N670GTX-PM2D2GD5/OC 2GB and now the Asus GeForce GTX670-DC2-4GD5 4GB.
The difference wasn't that big but it was noticeable, I can't remember any numbers of before and after but it made it possible for me to activate all effects, set the quality settings to the best quality available and use 1.0 (and higher) for the scales in both reflections and SSAO. And I have a stable 35+ average FPS with that. I think it's at that level, memory deceives me for the moment
The difference wasn't that big but it was noticeable, I can't remember any numbers of before and after but it made it possible for me to activate all effects, set the quality settings to the best quality available and use 1.0 (and higher) for the scales in both reflections and SSAO. And I have a stable 35+ average FPS with that. I think it's at that level, memory deceives me for the moment
-
Offline
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 19:22
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
My FPS is between 58-65 currently with VRAM maxed at 2048mb (which is what my GPU is), with about 140 mods and practically high settings without AA. If I downloaded more, it wouldn't crash my game, only lower the FPS, correct? My RAM used to be at like 2800-3000, and now sits at about 700 only thanks to ENB. But since VRAM doesn't crash the game when maxed it should only reduce FPS if I raise the settings or download more mods?--JawZ-- wrote:I did a similar upgrade when my GTX 670 2gb fried on me. I had the MSI GeForce N670GTX-PM2D2GD5/OC 2GB and now the Asus GeForce GTX670-DC2-4GD5 4GB.
The difference wasn't that big but it was noticeable, I can't remember any numbers of before and after but it made it possible for me to activate all effects, set the quality settings to the best quality available and use 1.0 (and higher) for the scales in both reflections and SSAO. And I have a stable 35+ average FPS with that. I think it's at that level, memory deceives me for the moment
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 19 Jul 2013, 13:04
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
you should NOT load more than your VRAM. Think about it how can it draw/render if it doesnt load into the VRAM/Max out.tgpomy wrote:My FPS is between 58-65 currently with VRAM maxed at 2048mb (which is what my GPU is), with about 140 mods and practically high settings without AA. If I downloaded more, it wouldn't crash my game, only lower the FPS, correct? My RAM used to be at like 2800-3000, and now sits at about 700 only thanks to ENB. But since VRAM doesn't crash the game when maxed it should only reduce FPS if I raise the settings or download more mods?--JawZ-- wrote:I did a similar upgrade when my GTX 670 2gb fried on me. I had the MSI GeForce N670GTX-PM2D2GD5/OC 2GB and now the Asus GeForce GTX670-DC2-4GD5 4GB.
The difference wasn't that big but it was noticeable, I can't remember any numbers of before and after but it made it possible for me to activate all effects, set the quality settings to the best quality available and use 1.0 (and higher) for the scales in both reflections and SSAO. And I have a stable 35+ average FPS with that. I think it's at that level, memory deceives me for the moment
_________________
W10*I7 6700K*MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium*2x Titan X Pascal*32GB 3600mhz DDR4* 3x 512GB Samsung Pro SSD*ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
W10*I7 6700K*MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium*2x Titan X Pascal*32GB 3600mhz DDR4* 3x 512GB Samsung Pro SSD*ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
ENBSeries wrote: Welcome to AMD world! Don't complains to me, you bought it, have a nice time.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
tgpomy;
Ok, if you can run with these settings with a 50-55 average FPS in riverwood than there is no point in you buying the 4GB version, instead save the money and wait until you can afford a faster gfx card with 4GB instead.
File settings - http://www.mediafire.com/download/oszbh ... series.ini
Ok, if you can run with these settings with a 50-55 average FPS in riverwood than there is no point in you buying the 4GB version, instead save the money and wait until you can afford a faster gfx card with 4GB instead.
File settings - http://www.mediafire.com/download/oszbh ... series.ini
-
Offline
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 19:22
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
I got about 45-50 FPS. Would it be worth buying a GTX 680 FTW 4GB? I found one for $420 used.--JawZ-- wrote:tgpomy;
Ok, if you can run with these settings with a 50-55 average FPS in riverwood than there is no point in you buying the 4GB version, instead save the money and wait until you can afford a faster gfx card with 4GB instead.
File settings - http://www.mediafire.com/download/oszbh ... series.ini
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
With a 680 in Skyrim you would gain around 10 to 15 FPS, maybe more. At least it's a more reasonable upgrade, I only went from 670 2gb to 4gb as I sold the returned and fixed 2gb card to my brother and I needed a new card as I did not have any other laying around.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 19 Jul 2013, 13:04
Re: TES Skyrim 0.198
what video card u using now ?tgpomy wrote:I got about 45-50 FPS. Would it be worth buying a GTX 680 FTW 4GB? I found one for $420 used.--JawZ-- wrote:tgpomy;
Ok, if you can run with these settings with a 50-55 average FPS in riverwood than there is no point in you buying the 4GB version, instead save the money and wait until you can afford a faster gfx card with 4GB instead.
File settings - http://www.mediafire.com/download/oszbh ... series.ini
_________________
W10*I7 6700K*MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium*2x Titan X Pascal*32GB 3600mhz DDR4* 3x 512GB Samsung Pro SSD*ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
W10*I7 6700K*MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium*2x Titan X Pascal*32GB 3600mhz DDR4* 3x 512GB Samsung Pro SSD*ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
ENBSeries wrote: Welcome to AMD world! Don't complains to me, you bought it, have a nice time.