TES Skyrim 0.245

Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

jrista
Compare quality and performance and choose what you prefer, i can't explain this.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

Does anyone care about closed/opened spoilers in GUI of editor? Because too much parameters and it's hard to schroll to something you want, at least for me when restarting game many times while developing mod. Let me know should i make all groups of parameters closed, only some of them (when aren't?) or keep as it is now.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1938
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

I vote for having them all closed at start up, I too find it a bit annoying to scroll through the entire list.
I also restart the game many times for mod testing and code development and what not, so it would be nice to have them closed instead of open like they have been since you implemented the GUI function.

I have not gotten around to test the new version yet as I don't have my game rig at my disposal for the time being. And testing the SSAO on my work rig is going to be "hard", running with ultra low settings at 1280x786 resolution with no ENB effects activated results in 10 to 13 FPS.
But from the posted pic and user input I can see there has been in improvement of it.

Offline
User avatar
Posts: 15
Joined: 22 Aug 2013, 10:11

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

I can't see the 0.245 download button..maybe a browser issue?

I see now..change location

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

Another question. Indirect lighting is much more noisy than ambient occlusion, because of it's nature of math computation, to reduce noise i did simplified version of ssil and everybody use it probably from 0.102 or 0.119 (don't remember) in Skyrim (may be in Fallout too, because i ported code to it, other mods use proper math). Now with ssao/ssil supersampling it's possible to restore code of valid indirect lighting vectors and not to get flickering-blinking points everywhere, it require UseComplexIndirectLightint=true, so you at least must use this (or without it indirect lighting absolutely wrong approximation, but fast and even less noisy). First, is it really important or users under imprinting are fine with existing ssil and will say "previous was much more realistic"? Second, is this must be another parameter or just forced always on?
Here are comparison images, #1 is current, #2 is proper, notice difference by noise for them and if you know how indirect lighting work, it's easy to understand what is wrong with #1.

Image

Image
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

Personally, I'm all for restoring valid code.

But I wouldn't force it on, and add another parameter for it.
The more tastes, the more control over it, if it doesn't bother you too much to make new parameter.
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1938
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

I'm with Oyama on this one.

Offline
User avatar
*sensei*
Posts: 391
Joined: 03 Oct 2012, 06:12
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

I'd make as a separate option, if possible. However, the visual (indirect lighting) on the first image is quite bad that if the feature is always forced on (as shown in the second image), then I would not personally mind.
_________________
Intel Core i9 10900K @4.9GHz | ASUS ROG Strix Z490-G | NVIDIA - EVGA RTX 2080 XC Ultra | 32GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO | 2x ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB

Flickr
Twitter

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

Sorry, i did mistake, forgot scaling, so second image have twice less intensity, edited post, replaced image.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 572
Joined: 23 Aug 2013, 21:59
Location: United States

Re: TES Skyrim 0.245

I'm with Oyama on this as well.

Sorry, haven't gotten around to actually trying 0.245 yet. I've been playing Elder Scrolls Online Beta (It's a beta weekend) all day and just stepped away. It started feeling grindy after 10 hours straight. =P Anyway, I'm gonna take my eyes off the screen for a bit, they feel weird, then either go to bed or try out 0.245. I haven't decided the order yet :P
_________________
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6C/12T @4.4GHz // 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 3600MHz // ASRock AMD Radeon 5700XT Taichi X 8GB OC+// Samsung 850 Evo 256GB and 500GB SSD // 4 TB Seagate Barracuda // Windows 10 x64
Lumen ENB
My Flickr
Post Reply