TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17549
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Yes, but i don't care if they use two channel texture or not and why they use it. Original game post processing mode is not required, those who want it can play without mod. Skyrim SE users required replacing post processing, so i did it and what is left about it, what kind of adaptation it use - doesn't matter any more.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13 Nov 2016, 15:35
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Thank you for your work on Skyrim SE. Do you have a plan to implement per weather settings?
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17549
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Only when game stops to be patched.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17549
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Folks, do you need ShadowBoost similar to Fallout 4?
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 09 Jul 2015, 16:13
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
I think so. It would help people with less powerful hardware. The only question is, will you have to remake the shadow boost mod each time bugthesda updates the game? If so, I can wait until game stops being patched.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
- Location: France
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Yes, please, for same reason as above.
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 10:29
- Location: Taiwan
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
@boris
Copy that.
Copy that.
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 462
- Joined: 16 Jan 2016, 19:15
- Location: Austria
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Yes, that would be great.
_________________
AMD Ryzen 2700x 8 Core, Scythe Mugen PCGH Edition, MSI X470 Gaming Pro Carbon, Gainward Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Phoenix, 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3200 Mhz, LG 34UM88C-P UHD, Win 10 64 bit
AMD Ryzen 2700x 8 Core, Scythe Mugen PCGH Edition, MSI X470 Gaming Pro Carbon, Gainward Geforce GTX 1080 Ti Phoenix, 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3200 Mhz, LG 34UM88C-P UHD, Win 10 64 bit
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 23:06
- Location: New Hampshire, US
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
Just to provide a different bit of feedback I am fine without shadow boost. I haven't had any issues with SE in that regard. In FO4 it was really bad and found shadow boost to be very useful. But haven't noticed that level of an issue in SE myself and been playing it a lot lately.
_________________
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
-
Offline
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 30 Oct 2016, 05:31
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.310
I have to agree with wolfgrimdark, while ShadowBoost would certainly be a nice feature in SSE (it was absolutely essential and fantastic in FO4), I don't believe there's necessarily a dire need for it here. I haven't had any issues regarding shadows and performance (though I don't know about other people), and maintaining ShadowBoost would (I imagine) increase the workload for you with not much pay off. Just my personal view on it.wolfgrimdark wrote:Just to provide a different bit of feedback I am fine without shadow boost. I haven't had any issues with SE in that regard. In FO4 it was really bad and found shadow boost to be very useful. But haven't noticed that level of an issue in SE myself and been playing it a lot lately.
Either way, I'm happy!