TES Skyrim 0.193
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 05 Jun 2012, 14:47
- Location: Canada
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
Version similar to .192.
Same distance as without ENB, Better FPS than ENB Test 13 (Possibly because of HD textures not loaded, and getting the "missing texture" texture instead).
_________________
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17553
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
DaemonWhite
Textures are created, but not filled with data.
I'm confused now. At least from last results by DaemonWhite, DigitalPrinceX and torminater any fixes of the mod have zero or negative impact on CTD and performance vs vanilla. Why then for version 0.192 results were positive?
Textures are created, but not filled with data.
I'm confused now. At least from last results by DaemonWhite, DigitalPrinceX and torminater any fixes of the mod have zero or negative impact on CTD and performance vs vanilla. Why then for version 0.192 results were positive?
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 312
- Joined: 18 Jul 2012, 09:46
- Location: Bangladesh
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
Uh i am noob with texture and art formats. Cannot understand anything.
From messing around with GIMP i think dxt5 compressed or whatever is not right in some texture.
Boris
Performance is better for us when we do not intentionally push for over 3GB limit. If we keep default ugrids=5 my super modded skyrim runs better with only 64bit fix enable, reduce system memory disable. Without any fix game crash after 10 min
From messing around with GIMP i think dxt5 compressed or whatever is not right in some texture.
Boris
Performance is better for us when we do not intentionally push for over 3GB limit. If we keep default ugrids=5 my super modded skyrim runs better with only 64bit fix enable, reduce system memory disable. Without any fix game crash after 10 min
_________________
CPU :: Core i7 2600k @3.40GHz
GPU :: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 GHz edition 2GB
Ram :: 8GB
Sound :: Creative X-Fi Titanium
OS :: Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
CPU :: Core i7 2600k @3.40GHz
GPU :: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 GHz edition 2GB
Ram :: 8GB
Sound :: Creative X-Fi Titanium
OS :: Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 445
- Joined: 29 Jan 2013, 01:17
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
.
Last edited by Rubber-De-Flubber on 25 May 2022, 22:13, edited 1 time in total.
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 05 Jun 2012, 14:47
- Location: Canada
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
I was intentionally pushing my Skyrim beyond what the limit was to see how long it took until I crashed. I also recently installed as many HD textures as I could find as well, compared to the few lite textures I had before. I'll run a set of tests once more with uGrids at the default value (I had it at 7 for those tests).ENBSeries wrote:DaemonWhite
Textures are created, but not filled with data.
I'm confused now. At least from last results by DaemonWhite, DigitalPrinceX and torminater any fixes of the mod have zero or negative impact on CTD and performance vs vanilla. Why then for version 0.192 results were positive?
_________________
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 18:42
- Location: Norway
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
All tests with ugrid 9, just to make sure they run. ran them a couple times :>
10 and 11 was similar to eachother, these had frequent stutter but ok cell loads. They used alot V-Ram fast up to 3GB, after fast travel it passes 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 4-5 seconds.
12 was prbly the best of these 4 I think. It had less stutter and faster (more) cell loads. It used alot V-Ram too up to 3GB (looked more active in the profiler). After fast travel it pass 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 9-10 sec
13 had slight more stutter but still fast cell loads. Same amount V-Ram but ctd instant after fast travel
3-4-9 still have the best performance of them all I think, and they was run with ugrid 11 :>
Should I do some tests with lower ugrid?
10 and 11 was similar to eachother, these had frequent stutter but ok cell loads. They used alot V-Ram fast up to 3GB, after fast travel it passes 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 4-5 seconds.
12 was prbly the best of these 4 I think. It had less stutter and faster (more) cell loads. It used alot V-Ram too up to 3GB (looked more active in the profiler). After fast travel it pass 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 9-10 sec
13 had slight more stutter but still fast cell loads. Same amount V-Ram but ctd instant after fast travel
3-4-9 still have the best performance of them all I think, and they was run with ugrid 11 :>
Should I do some tests with lower ugrid?
_________________
Intel i7-5960X @4.6GHz EK Water Cooling^^/EVGA X99 Classified/2x Asus 980ti 6GB SLI
Samsung U28D590D @2160p/16GB G.Skill (DDR4)/Win10 Pro 64bit
Intel i7-5960X @4.6GHz EK Water Cooling^^/EVGA X99 Classified/2x Asus 980ti 6GB SLI
Samsung U28D590D @2160p/16GB G.Skill (DDR4)/Win10 Pro 64bit
-
Offline
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 20:20
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
ENB v0.188
Unplayable, too much stuttering
Test10
Better stability
Test11
Better stability, contrast change, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Test12
Better stability, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Test13
Better stability, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Screenshot using Test10
Unplayable, too much stuttering
Test10
Better stability
Test11
Better stability, contrast change, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Test12
Better stability, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Test13
Better stability, smooth even in very low 12-15 framerate
Screenshot using Test10
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 05 Jun 2012, 14:47
- Location: Canada
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
With uGridsToLoad set back to default (Removed from skyrim.ini / set to 5) and using Test 11:
I ran forever. No CTD at all, never went above 2.6-2.8 GB RAM usage. My test run was going from Half-Moon Mill (Near Riverwood) through the forest, down into the Tundra, back past Whiterun, and I was going to Windhelm when I stopped. It was never going to reach the CTD limit. At times, the RAM usage decreased instead of increased.
There is one possible culprit to the entire CTD issue: uGrids editing. Going to use Test 13 next as it gave me the smoothest framerate.
I ran forever. No CTD at all, never went above 2.6-2.8 GB RAM usage. My test run was going from Half-Moon Mill (Near Riverwood) through the forest, down into the Tundra, back past Whiterun, and I was going to Windhelm when I stopped. It was never going to reach the CTD limit. At times, the RAM usage decreased instead of increased.
There is one possible culprit to the entire CTD issue: uGrids editing. Going to use Test 13 next as it gave me the smoothest framerate.
_________________
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 05 Jun 2012, 14:47
- Location: Canada
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
Try default uGrids (5)Yersinia79 wrote:All tests with ugrid 9, just to make sure they run. ran them a couple times :>
10 and 11 was similar to eachother, these had frequent stutter but ok cell loads. They used alot V-Ram fast up to 3GB, after fast travel it passes 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 4-5 seconds.
12 was prbly the best of these 4 I think. It had less stutter and faster (more) cell loads. It used alot V-Ram too up to 3GB (looked more active in the profiler). After fast travel it pass 3GB V-Ram and ctd after 9-10 sec
13 had slight more stutter but still fast cell loads. Same amount V-Ram but ctd instant after fast travel
3-4-9 still have the best performance of them all I think, and they was run with ugrid 11 :>
Should I do some tests with lower ugrid?
_________________
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
Cpu: Intel i7 4790K @ 4.0GHz
Gpu: Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB GHz edition
RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 331
- Joined: 20 Jul 2013, 00:34
Re: TES Skyrim 0.193
Wow, test8 ran more than 13 minutes with uGrid9, and all these test DLLs fully utilized VRAM on my ATI 7850. Game ran very smoothly no stutter for my PC. I couldn't grab the other test DLLs, so I'll use with test8 DLL since it was the most stable one. Here's Skymon capture.