TES Skyrim 0.243

Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
Post Reply
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

I have no idea, only saw screenshot of 0.241 and 0.243 version, sky is very different. In debug preset i don't see anything and don't remember any changes which may affect anything like that.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

No differences on my side between .241 and .243, sky wise.
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
User avatar
Posts: 77
Joined: 22 Aug 2012, 08:17
Location: Logroño (Spain)

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

ok, understood.
Anyway, just for the record, this is the effect I'm talking about. See how the moonlight lights the surrounding clouds:

https://www.google.es/search?q=moon,+cl ... 80&bih=887
_________________
Intel i7 920 D0 @3,8ghz / Noctua NH-D14 / Asus P6x58D Premium / 3x4gb G.Skill Ripjaws PC12800 1600mhz
2xGTX680 SLI
Corsair AX860 PSU
Cooler Master HAF-X Case
Windows 7 64b

Offline
Posts: 77
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 20:38

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

Using the new AMD R9 290 and I can't get AddDisplaySuperSamplingResolutions= to work for me, for some reason it won't trick Skyrim into letting me use 2560x1440. Anyone got any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
_________________
I7-4750k @ 4.00ghz, Radeon R9 290x 4gb, 32gb Ripjaw RAM, Win 7 x 64 on SSD

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

refusedzero wrote:Using the new AMD R9 290 and I can't get AddDisplaySuperSamplingResolutions= to work for me, for some reason it won't trick Skyrim into letting me use 2560x1440. Anyone got any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
To my knowing, " AddDisplaySuperSamplingResolutions= " is hard-coded to render at 4K : 3840x2160.

Can't you simply dowsample via driver itself ?
Also, don't forget to modify your SkyrimPrefs.ini accordingly : (remove the " ; " before the sizes you want to use, let them all in since " ; " ones are commented out)

For 1440p :

;iSize W=1920
;iSize H=1080
iSize W=2560
iSize H=1440
;iSize W=2880
;iSize H=1620
;iSize W=3200
;iSize H=1800
;iSize W=3449
;iSize H=1940
;iSize W=3552
;iSize H=1998
;iSize W=3840
;iSize H=2160
Last edited by Oyama on 31 Dec 2013, 12:43, edited 4 times in total.
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
Posts: 77
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 20:38

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

Thank you! Had been rummaging around in old threads forever feeling like I'd gone stupid (perhaps I have).

Sorry for off-topic. Newest 0.243 fixed the issues with water that I didn't even realize I was having until after updating.

Edit: My issue was fixed thanks to Kyo!
Last edited by refusedzero on 31 Dec 2013, 13:05, edited 2 times in total.
_________________
I7-4750k @ 4.00ghz, Radeon R9 290x 4gb, 32gb Ripjaw RAM, Win 7 x 64 on SSD

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

refusedzero wrote: Edit: Strange, still getting 'Failed to initialize renderer' error from Skyrim at the fixed resolution. I must be doing something else stupid, lol.
EDIT : see my edit above ;)
Be aware that downsampling will dramatically increase overall colours consistency and black levels. The more pixels, the more everything. This has to be counterbalanced via enbeffect.fx, via several ways depending on the postprocess method you're using, or simply via proceduralcorrection. Brute force method can be via ColorPow also.
Indeed, when downsampling, you'll have to tweak a ton of things. There's nothing common between 1080p and 1440p already, 1080p is 2073600 pixels, 1440p is 3686400, almost TWICE more.

EDIT 2 : did you think about switching back " AddDisplaySuperSamplingResolutions= " to false in enblocal.ini ?
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
Posts: 77
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 20:38

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

Got it working, thank you! An obligatory "Woah!" is in order here! Skyrim just took a whole new turn for me!
_________________
I7-4750k @ 4.00ghz, Radeon R9 290x 4gb, 32gb Ripjaw RAM, Win 7 x 64 on SSD

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

Most welcome.
Downsampling is a brute force method, performance wise, but it improves *everything* in drastic ways.
Enjoy ! (and don't forget to check your GPU temps from time to time ;) ... )
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.243

Maegirom
It's not rays, parameters for that are CloudsEdgeClamp, CloudsEdgeIntensity (but i don't remember if it work for moons like i did in gta4).
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
Post Reply