TES Skyrim 0.244

Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1498
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 15:06
Location: France

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

My sig is up to date, yep.
And my FPS are the same as yours when backgrounds and action are quite heavy :)
_________________
Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop

Offline
*master*
Posts: 101
Joined: 30 Jun 2013, 20:28

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

Just want to say that I find it very useful and helpful to see which settings you guys are using. I've never really liked any preset I've tried out completely so I'm using my own tweaked ENB Series, albeit with lots of settings "stolen" from presets etc.
_________________
Intel i7-2700K @ 3.5Ghz | Win 8.1 64-bit | Crucial SSD 256GB | Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB | Crucial DDR3 1333MHz 8GB | XFX AMD Radeon R9 380 4GB | AOC D2757 27" @ 1920 x 1080

Offline
Posts: 46
Joined: 02 Sep 2013, 19:30
Location: Germany

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

Oyama wrote:My sig is up to date, yep.
And my FPS are the same as yours when backgrounds and action are quite heavy :)
Then I feel assured, I already thought my SLI system has a performance leak somewhere. One important fact I missed to tell, I play on a 27'' monitor in 2560 x 1440 resolution (and I never want back to only HD), which let me shrug about TemporalAA being not available for SLI systems (because this resolution is inbuild AA), but it sucks some fps for sure.

Btw, I just followed you on Flickr and have to say your pics are awesome.
Last edited by Sigurd44 on 10 Jan 2014, 20:28, edited 1 time in total.
_________________
Asus Z97 Deluxe
i7-4790K (oc 4400 Mhz)
2 x EGVA Geforce Titan X SLI
16 GB DDR3 RAM 1600 G.Skill
Samsung 840 Evo 1 TB SSD
Asus PB278Q 27'' 2560x1440

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1509
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

@all

i think this is a pretty good and important mod but it has many technical problems in the Engine maybe someone has some ideas how to get this working more stable within the Engine constraints.

http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/8058/

@Boris
Maybe you can help Arthmoor seems to be one of the most Advanced Modders out there knowing the Engine and it's constraints rather well and im sure he didn't gave up on the idea for nothing but you maybe understand better what happens here in the background and can maybe help finding another way of realizing this POC in a stable running way ?

Me is currently a little lost about how the different approaches to testing can even lead to different behavioral results (fast travel vs not fast travel interrior loading results) :(
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE

Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17557
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

CruNcher
I won't bother with anything, except graphics, don't like this game at all to give it so much attention, so don't expect any help.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1509
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

unfortunately i expected this but at least i tried, right ;)

@Boris
another question more on the technical side is it possible to get indirect specular response ?

Many materials reponses tend to totally fall apart in shadows and with IBL and the complete blue tint it looks just awkward :(
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE

Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard

Offline
Posts: 13
Joined: 04 Jan 2014, 21:25
Location: Germany

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

Thanks a lot for sharing your SSAO settings Kyokushinoyama! Very very useful for me :)

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17557
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

CruNcher
I don't know what is it "indirect specular response", if you mean reflection caustics, it's a bit too high for this crappy game, don't you think?
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1509
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

No no it seems many dont understand the nature of it some seem to even say it doesn't exist lol ;)

http://research.tri-ace.com/detail_2.html

@Boris
btw what did you changed on the IBL part i always had the feeling it was wrong do you have some side by side comparison of the old and new results or is it really just the scale ?

And what is the problem now with the newest Nvidia WHQL Drivers 332.21 ? (Nevermind just found OhKays report about it)
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE

Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17557
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: TES Skyrim 0.244

This can't be made, skyrim don't have separate properties to detect metallic surfaces and i applying ssao/ssil to all objects by the same math.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
Post Reply