TES Skyrim 0.245

[electricsheep26354]

electricsheep26354
3

Thanks decreases SSAO filter times from 0.0014 to 0.0004

[CruNcher]

@Boris
do i understand right it is Adaptive now ?

[kaffeekranz]

kaffeekranz
I don't have any ideas what could be wrong on your side, 4 times slower can be only for old videocards of dx10 generation with not much arithmetic units. May be someone else will share comparison results?

Strange, I'll do some testing.
In the meantime, electricsheep, Oyama, you guys want to do me a favour and run a profiler comparison for SSAO between v0.244 and v0.245? Pretty please?

[Arkngt]

Love the added supersampling - the game is more sharp/beautiful then ever.

All other settings being equal, supersampling costs me c. 3 FPS at the entrance to Whiterun (29.5 - 26.5), but as I can tone down the filter quality (29.5 @ 3 and 27.5 @ -1, w/o supersampling), the difference is just 1 FPS in practice. Totally worth it.

[Oyama]

Arkngt
What scales are you running ?

kaffeekranz
As soon as back on PC

[ENBSeries]

EDIT: no, false alarm, it's for proper computations of ssil vectors in debug version only.
I've found "bug" in latest ssao/ssil optimizations, indirect lighting is twice lower than in previous versions. Will do fix as only finish other changes to this code.

[electricsheep26354]

kaffeekranz
I don't have any ideas what could be wrong on your side, 4 times slower can be only for old videocards of dx10 generation with not much arithmetic units. May be someone else will share comparison results?

Strange, I'll do some testing.
In the meantime, electricsheep, Oyama, you guys want to do me a favour and run a profiler comparison for SSAO between v0.244 and v0.245? Pretty please?

SSAO times (setting as per my previous post but SSAO filter quality set to 3)

0.244 = 0.0065

0.245 = 0.0130 (with supersampling enabled)

[ENBSeries]

Ignore my previous post, it's not a bug.

[Arkngt]

Arkngt
What scales are you running ?

[SSAO_SSIL]
EnableSupersampling=true
UseIndirectLighting=true
UseComplexIndirectLighting=true
UseComplexAmbientOcclusion=true
UseAmbientIndirectLighting=false
SamplingQuality=-1
SamplingPrecision=1
SamplingRange=0.28
FadeFogRange=16.0
SizeScale=1.0
SourceTexturesScale=1.0
FilterQuality=3
FilterType=0
AOAmount=0.83
AOAmountInterior=0.82
ILAmount=2.71
ILAmountInterior=2.69
AOMixingType=2
AOMixingTypeInterior=2
AOIntensity=0.78
AOIntensityInterior=0.80
AOType=0
UseOldType=false
EnableDenoiser=false

BTW, how do you guys check the SSAO filter times?

EDIT: Found it - and it's twice as slow for me as well. 0.0045 w/o Supersampling, 0.0082 with it.

[kaffeekranz]

0.244 = 0.0065

0.245 = 0.0130 (with supersampling enabled)

Thanks man.
Yes, of course I meant to say 'no supersampling' vs 'with supersampling', so thanks for understanding my 'just woke up'-gibberish.

kaffeekranz
As soon as back on PC

And a thanks to you.
But if your results are going to be in line with electricsheep's then I'm out of ideas.. using older driver's (although I didn't even try the new problematic ones) didn't change anything, so I'll test Boris' standard config later on.