ENBSeries wrote:If you talk about artistic styles like cell shading, it's different story and planned in far far future. Just normals are not enough for such things.
I promise to (attempt to) write a cell shader if you give access to normals and eye vector Didn't you say a few threads back that you were surprised that no one had written one yet? How could they without normals and eye vector? To me they just seems like very basic things to have in a shader. Sorry to be a bother. Thanks for considering.
number6
Per pixel normals are not required for any artistic style, i don't have per vertex normals and you can generate per triangle normals from depth. So what's the problem? Point me in to paper where normals required and which will not produce ugly artifacts in case of not per vertex.
Boris
Thanx for latest updates !
Noob questions :
- You were planning to "rescale" quality levels and adding " -2 " values, did you drop the thing for now ?
- Is it possible to expand to " -1 " the ones clamped to 0 for now ? (Skylighting...) Pointless ?
- Are you actually planning major additions, just a selfish question as I have to update 3 presets in order to release them if ever ?....
_________________ Lian Li PC011 Dynamic, Corsair AX 1500i PSU, i9 10850K @5.0 Ghz, Aorus Z490 Ultra, RTX3090 MSI Gaming X Trio, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM@3600, Corsair MP600 1TB NVME System Drive, 10 TB Storage, W10 Pro 64, Custom Hard Tubing Watercooling Loop
No CTD here. Everything works perfectly, just for the exception of transparent objects when in front of mist, mostly particles like flames, fires and spells.
Didn't you say a few threads back that you were surprised that no one had written one yet? How could they without normals and eye vector? To me they just seems like very basic things to have in a shader. Sorry to be a bother. Thanks for considering.
