Oh boy, can't wait to see what Bethesda broke.

I have for a long time now used effect.txt as any of the more common 3rd party plugins, like SweetFX and ReShade, And simply ported the code or done it in another way or something.
But if the feature for DX11 won't be able to have sharpening looking like it should, then there are still other effects one can add to it that belongs better in that shader file than any other type of shader, previously available. Cosmetic/screen-archery type effects and the likes.
The sharpening I would gather won't have the same broken use as currently in Fallout 4 and will in other future DX11 supported games work, I would think.
But as it is currently an update for Fallout 4 that we're talking about, I would say it's up to you yourself to decide if it is actually worth having at this stage of ENBSeries.

I noticed a lot of slow downs when fire is visible, and now reached the SAUGUS there is generally up to 10 fps drop for almost all enemies are running around with flamethrowers and even molotov, game turns into madness. Is it possible something to do with it?

EDIT: changed to more readable english by admin

_________________

amd fx 4300 @ 4.5-5.0ghz 1.38v
Kingston 1600mhz 8gb
asus m5a78l-m plus
hitachi HDS721050 500gb 7200rpm
Palit GTX 470


https://portal2x2.imgbb.com

ENB said



man that was totally brilliant, lol

_________________
i7 920_|XFX RX480 8GB|_15GB Cheap Ram

Oh man that picture is great

@Boris

As for effext.txt, I have always liked using this feature instead of another injector (the name does not matter). However, it is not the most important feature of ENB, so I can understand if you do not want to invest your time and energy into this feature.

_________________
Fallout 4 ENB Video Series | Skyrim ENB Video Series | My YouTube Channel
Intel i7-4700HQ @ 2.4GHz | NVidia GTX780M 4GB | 24GB RAM

@Tapioks, i understood that the effect.txt feature will get rendered after the final effects of the game, so to put any sharpening or other effects there
would probably ruin the other visuals (you don't want to sharpen your DOF and Bethesda AO artifacts),
so any effect added probably needs to be added in fx files that can be rendered before Fallout does anything.

I could be wrong again..lol..

_________________
Intel I5 8600k, GTX 1080, 256GB Samsung EVO 970 M.2, 256GB Samsung EVO, 500GB Samsung EVO, 1,5TB WD Caviar Green, Realtek HD Audio, 16GB 15-17-17-36 3000MHZ System RAM, W7 Pro x64.

http://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/2139/?

I'm sure nobody here is surprised this type of mod appeared again. Regardless, I thought it was important enough to leave you guys a headsup. I imagine it will pretty much become a requirement to any future ENB preset.

Hi Boris,

I made a video explaining how everyone can determine the correct VideoMemorySizeMB value to use for their own particular hardware setup. Hopefully my explanation is not inaccurate, can you let me know if any of this is incorrect?

_________________
Fallout 4 ENB Video Series | Skyrim ENB Video Series | My YouTube Channel
Intel i7-4700HQ @ 2.4GHz | NVidia GTX780M 4GB | 24GB RAM

Beta of the new patch is out

http://steamcommunity.com/games/377160/ ... 1172870673

tapioks
Everything seems correct, but probably it's unclear at the end that amount of memory computed by algorithm must not be bigger than reported by the VRamSizeTest.


Got another question. Is bloom shader need alpha channel of textures and the same 64 bit hdr format as before or should i use dx11 specific 32 bit hdr format with lower precision and no alpha, for higher performance? For me bloom is not slow thing, but if to make it max resolution about 1024 (old is 512), frame rate may be noticable lower.

_________________
i5-4690k, 16Gb RAM, GTX 1060 6Gb, X-Fi Titanium, Win7 x128
I am INFP, not the brutal, godamnit.