Fallout 4 0.291

Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
Post Reply
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
*master*
Posts: 187
Joined: 18 Mar 2015, 18:39

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Yeah, God-Rays are a JOKE in Fallout 4. I think it was a quick and mostly thoughtless job of implement NVidia feature to make Fallout 4 an "NVidia Game". Anyway, I play Fallout 4 with Neutral LUT's, a ton of image-improvng mods (in a variety of ways) and basic ENB features enabled (DoF + Dithering Enabled, Adaptation + Bloom + Lens-Flare Disabled) and certain ReShade features enabled. I simply try to make the calibrated vanilla image to look as good as possible without changing grayscale (white balance, gamma, tints, hues, saturation, etc.). This is the only way to make Fallout 4 look good in ALL locations during gameplay, which doesn't fit with the concept of using highly-customized ENB + ReShade Presets for screenshots of specific locations that look gorgeous, although such presets tend to make many locations look really bad... The question is this - Should I post any of my screenshots of the Neutral Vanilla "Calibrated" image of Fallout 4? They do NOT look as good as most other shots here...
I thought I posted the above in the Fallout 4 Gallery thread...
_________________
i7 8700K @ 5Ghz | ASUS Z370 Hero X WiFi | Corsair 16GB @ 3200Mhz | RTX 2070 Super @ 1950Mhz | Xonar DGX | 768GB NVMe SSD | 2TB HDD | Corsair 850W | LG 32GK850G-B 1440p 32' G-Sync 165Hz VA | Logitech G402 | Corsair K70 Rapidfire | Windows 10 LTSC 1809

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 619
Joined: 29 Dec 2011, 20:05
Location: Санкт-Петербург

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Happy new year, I would like to ask, this is the so-called transparency bug?
http://rghost.ru/7zgxlcVRV.view
_________________

AMD RYZEN 2600
Patriot DDR4 signature premium 16gb 3000ghz
MSI A320M-A PRO
Patriot burst elite SSD 480gb
hitachi HDS721050 500gb 7200rpm
Gigabyte GTX 1060 6gb

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1938
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 02:08

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

That is just how that particular water "fade" values have been setup causing that "transparency bug" as you call it. Same effect can be had in Skyrim waters.

Notice the water leaves in this image for instance
Vanilla: http://imgur.com/a/AREgn#7
Altered: http://imgur.com/a/AREgn#8

Offline
User avatar
Posts: 30
Joined: 30 Apr 2014, 20:52
Location: Greece

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

MonarchX wrote:
Yeah, God-Rays are a JOKE in Fallout 4. I think it was a quick and mostly thoughtless job of implement NVidia feature to make Fallout 4 an "NVidia Game". Anyway, I play Fallout 4 with Neutral LUT's, a ton of image-improvng mods (in a variety of ways) and basic ENB features enabled (DoF + Dithering Enabled, Adaptation + Bloom + Lens-Flare Disabled) and certain ReShade features enabled. I simply try to make the calibrated vanilla image to look as good as possible without changing grayscale (white balance, gamma, tints, hues, saturation, etc.). This is the only way to make Fallout 4 look good in ALL locations during gameplay, which doesn't fit with the concept of using highly-customized ENB + ReShade Presets for screenshots of specific locations that look gorgeous, although such presets tend to make many locations look really bad... The question is this - Should I post any of my screenshots of the Neutral Vanilla "Calibrated" image of Fallout 4? They do NOT look as good as most other shots here...
I thought I posted the above in the Fallout 4 Gallery thread...

I disagree about sunrays, they add to overall immersion, especially during rad storms. (I use q=3)

http://i.imgur.com/q8zHDga.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/9Nor4Sk.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/J9zroDi.jpg
_________________
i5 4670K @ 4.4Ghz H2O (Corsair H110), Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H, G.skill TridentX 16 GB Ram 2.4Ghz C10, 2x Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 , Win 7 x64 on SSD, games on RAID-0
SLI+3D Vision(2)+G Sync
(forum Ghost,not posting unless really has to)

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 565
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 10:29
Location: Taiwan

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Happy New Year.
_________________
Intel Xeon L5639 6C12T @3.96GHz | Gigabyte ga-x58a-ud3r | MSI GTX680 4G | 48G RAM | Intel 760p Nvme w clover bootloader
Flickr
YouTube

Offline
User avatar
*sensei*
Posts: 252
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 20:38
Location: Greece

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Happy new year to all and to you Boris my love i wish you the best 2016 :D
_________________
ImageImage
/ Youtube Channel / Music Channel /
CPU: Intel Core i7-6850k @4.2GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Aorus OC 6gb vram RAM: Corsair DDR4 32gb Disk Drive: SSD Mushkin 120gb

Offline
User avatar
*sensei*
Posts: 432
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 18:42
Location: Norway

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Late but Happy New Year All :D
Excited for possible ENBSeries for Dragon's Dogma, hope port is well done^^
_________________
Intel i7-5960X @4.6GHz EK Water Cooling^^/EVGA X99 Classified/2x Asus 980ti 6GB SLI
Samsung U28D590D @2160p/16GB G.Skill (DDR4)/Win10 Pro 64bit

Offline
*master*
Posts: 187
Joined: 18 Mar 2015, 18:39

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

spanian77 wrote:
MonarchX wrote:
Yeah, God-Rays are a JOKE in Fallout 4. I think it was a quick and mostly thoughtless job of implement NVidia feature to make Fallout 4 an "NVidia Game". Anyway, I play Fallout 4 with Neutral LUT's, a ton of image-improvng mods (in a variety of ways) and basic ENB features enabled (DoF + Dithering Enabled, Adaptation + Bloom + Lens-Flare Disabled) and certain ReShade features enabled. I simply try to make the calibrated vanilla image to look as good as possible without changing grayscale (white balance, gamma, tints, hues, saturation, etc.). This is the only way to make Fallout 4 look good in ALL locations during gameplay, which doesn't fit with the concept of using highly-customized ENB + ReShade Presets for screenshots of specific locations that look gorgeous, although such presets tend to make many locations look really bad... The question is this - Should I post any of my screenshots of the Neutral Vanilla "Calibrated" image of Fallout 4? They do NOT look as good as most other shots here...
I thought I posted the above in the Fallout 4 Gallery thread...

I disagree about sunrays, they add to overall immersion, especially during rad storms. (I use q=3)

http://i.imgur.com/q8zHDga.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/9Nor4Sk.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/J9zroDi.jpg
Its fine at the lowest possible setting. The joke is that higher settings make 0 or 0.001% difference at a huge cost.
_________________
i7 8700K @ 5Ghz | ASUS Z370 Hero X WiFi | Corsair 16GB @ 3200Mhz | RTX 2070 Super @ 1950Mhz | Xonar DGX | 768GB NVMe SSD | 2TB HDD | Corsair 850W | LG 32GK850G-B 1440p 32' G-Sync 165Hz VA | Logitech G402 | Corsair K70 Rapidfire | Windows 10 LTSC 1809

Offline
*master*
Posts: 101
Joined: 30 Jun 2013, 20:28

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

MonarchX wrote:
spanian77 wrote:
MonarchX wrote:
Yeah, God-Rays are a JOKE in Fallout 4. I think it was a quick and mostly thoughtless job of implement NVidia feature to make Fallout 4 an "NVidia Game". Anyway, I play Fallout 4 with Neutral LUT's, a ton of image-improvng mods (in a variety of ways) and basic ENB features enabled (DoF + Dithering Enabled, Adaptation + Bloom + Lens-Flare Disabled) and certain ReShade features enabled. I simply try to make the calibrated vanilla image to look as good as possible without changing grayscale (white balance, gamma, tints, hues, saturation, etc.). This is the only way to make Fallout 4 look good in ALL locations during gameplay, which doesn't fit with the concept of using highly-customized ENB + ReShade Presets for screenshots of specific locations that look gorgeous, although such presets tend to make many locations look really bad... The question is this - Should I post any of my screenshots of the Neutral Vanilla "Calibrated" image of Fallout 4? They do NOT look as good as most other shots here...
I thought I posted the above in the Fallout 4 Gallery thread...

I disagree about sunrays, they add to overall immersion, especially during rad storms. (I use q=3)

http://i.imgur.com/q8zHDga.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/9Nor4Sk.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/J9zroDi.jpg
Its fine at the lowest possible setting. The joke is that higher settings make 0 or 0.001% difference at a huge cost.
For me it's the opposite: I MUST have it at Ultra as I get blocky ugliness at all settings below it, as in this comparison:

https://i.imgur.com/93z4cJq.gif
_________________
Intel i7-2700K @ 3.5Ghz | Win 8.1 64-bit | Crucial SSD 256GB | Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB | Crucial DDR3 1333MHz 8GB | XFX AMD Radeon R9 380 4GB | AOC D2757 27" @ 1920 x 1080

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 506
Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 23:06
Location: New Hampshire, US

Re: Fallout 4 0.291

Arkngt wrote:
SNIP

For me it's the opposite: I MUST have it at Ultra as I get blocky ugliness at all settings below it, as in this comparison:

SNIP
I have the same experience as Arkngt. Unless I put God Rays at ultra I have artifact issues. On my set up there is a big difference between ultra and lower quality.
_________________
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
Post Reply