Fallout 4 0.293
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
Stop talking about vxgi or vxao, it's all imposible for bethesda developers, such effects need very fast and optimized engine.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
Then they need more Help from Nvidia Engineers but they are anyways very open to it
according to the advertisement statement of their current pr guy Pete Hines at least
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzoQ-H3 ... u.be&t=184
I would say overhead wise there is still enough headroom after the deferred and temporal transition for more GPU tasks per frame @ 1080p with a 30 FPS target at least on Nvidias Maxwell.
lets calculate 50% VXGI overhead @ worst it could work
But yeah i also Personaly think that a Ubisoft Studio Title will use it first maybe Watch_Dogs 2
@Boris
How can this be ?
gr on
gr off
according to the advertisement statement of their current pr guy Pete Hines at least
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzoQ-H3 ... u.be&t=184
I would say overhead wise there is still enough headroom after the deferred and temporal transition for more GPU tasks per frame @ 1080p with a 30 FPS target at least on Nvidias Maxwell.
lets calculate 50% VXGI overhead @ worst it could work
But yeah i also Personaly think that a Ubisoft Studio Title will use it first maybe Watch_Dogs 2
@Boris
How can this be ?
gr on
gr off
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE
Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 08:00
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
Hey Boris, I noticed a recent beta update made mention of memory optimizations. Did you check it out? Would be nice if they finally got their act together.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
No, i'm busy with Dragon's Dogma now, while somebody still play it. Fallout can wait, last version require fixes anyway.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 08:00
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
True, Fallout 4 can definitively wait. Decided a year ago the game was not worth playing until it had been modded for a few years. Typical Bethesda game.
-
Offline
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 23:23
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
Bethesda has a decades-long history of releasing buggy games, with my first experience being TES 2: Daggerfall. Fallout 4 seems to be a lot less buggy than Fallout 3 though, even on the 2009 Radeon HD5870 1GB GPU in my desktop (but also runs fine on the GTX 980M 8GB in my new laptop).
I'm currently using ENB exclusively for its DoF implementation, as the vanilla one is useless (I can't even notice it except when in dialogue with NPCs).
I'm currently using ENB exclusively for its DoF implementation, as the vanilla one is useless (I can't even notice it except when in dialogue with NPCs).
-
Offline
- *master*
- Posts: 187
- Joined: 18 Mar 2015, 18:39
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
What kind of bugs does 0.293 version have and where can they be seen/experienced? Is 0.293 faster (memory optimizations) than 0.291? I am just trying to conduct a cost-benefit analysis.
_________________
i7 8700K @ 5Ghz | ASUS Z370 Hero X WiFi | Corsair 16GB @ 3200Mhz | RTX 2070 Super @ 1950Mhz | Xonar DGX | 768GB NVMe SSD | 2TB HDD | Corsair 850W | LG 32GK850G-B 1440p 32' G-Sync 165Hz VA | Logitech G402 | Corsair K70 Rapidfire | Windows 10 LTSC 1809
i7 8700K @ 5Ghz | ASUS Z370 Hero X WiFi | Corsair 16GB @ 3200Mhz | RTX 2070 Super @ 1950Mhz | Xonar DGX | 768GB NVMe SSD | 2TB HDD | Corsair 850W | LG 32GK850G-B 1440p 32' G-Sync 165Hz VA | Logitech G402 | Corsair K70 Rapidfire | Windows 10 LTSC 1809
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
I don't remember, check older posts of this topic, did some changes and they not worked properly. Atm i'm making skyrim version.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 23:23
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
Here are the change notes:MonarchX wrote:What kind of bugs does 0.293 version have and where can they be seen/experienced? Is 0.293 faster (memory optimizations) than 0.291? I am just trying to conduct a cost-benefit analysis.
Edit: And here is what one ENB preset author has to say:Added sun and ambient lighting controls to [ENVIRONMENT] category of enbseries.ini config file.
Also performance is a bit decreased because some code for future effects is enabled.
***ENBSeries v0.293 NOT RECOMMENDED***
I will not be updating to ENBSeries v0.293 as I believe it is causing some flickering when bringing up the Pipboy. After a user reported this issue, it started occurring for me while I was testing v0.293. The problem went away as soon as I reverted back to v0.291. If anybody has more to report regarding screen flickering while bringing up the Pipboy please PM me.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: Fallout 4 0.293
This mod version removed and no longer supported. Bugs reported by users and which i see myself are something mind blowing which require very deep research and it's not possible with new game patch, so i need to do everything again. Topic closed.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7