TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Had a chance to test Skyrim SE performance using gtx560 without mod and with it. In same area of Riverwood with no vsync, no fps limiter i have 51 fps with no mod installed (Steam overlay for monitoring fps) and with mod disabled. When mod enabled, its 46 fps. Resolution is 1280*720, some random enbseries.ini setting. I'll get back videocard soon, so if there any suggestion how to make me see "huge" performance drop with the mod installed and disabled, its the last chance.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 15 Jun 2017, 18:17
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Just want to confirm the performance issue, which i came across working on a new build.
System : i7-4930k, 32gb ram, SSD drives, GTX 1080ti, no overclock, Win10 fall creators 1709.
Using MO2 - with only SKSE64, SSEFixes, USSEP, & SkyUI - steam overlay for fps - no vsync - no fps cap - 1920x1080
with Bethini Ultra settings:
Standing at the top of the Dragons Reach steps, looking down on Whiterun:
w/o ENB binaries - 120 fps
with ENB binaries - 86 fps (effects disabled)
on Riverwood Bridge
w/o ENB binaries - 87 fps
with ENB binaries - 54 fps (effects disabled)
tho these numbers aren't bad, the missing headroom becomes noticeable quickly once you add ENB processing and Mods. a relatively full build (200 mods) gives me 59fps w/no enb at the Dragons reach stairs and 38fps with ENB.
System : i7-4930k, 32gb ram, SSD drives, GTX 1080ti, no overclock, Win10 fall creators 1709.
Using MO2 - with only SKSE64, SSEFixes, USSEP, & SkyUI - steam overlay for fps - no vsync - no fps cap - 1920x1080
with Bethini Ultra settings:
Standing at the top of the Dragons Reach steps, looking down on Whiterun:
w/o ENB binaries - 120 fps
with ENB binaries - 86 fps (effects disabled)
on Riverwood Bridge
w/o ENB binaries - 87 fps
with ENB binaries - 54 fps (effects disabled)
tho these numbers aren't bad, the missing headroom becomes noticeable quickly once you add ENB processing and Mods. a relatively full build (200 mods) gives me 59fps w/no enb at the Dragons reach stairs and 38fps with ENB.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
https://imgur.com/a/e2WDG
This is what i have from bridge, with mod enabled. Without it Steam fps counter shows 46 fps. I cant see difference without high end videocard. So, i ignore performance from now.
This is what i have from bridge, with mod enabled. Without it Steam fps counter shows 46 fps. I cant see difference without high end videocard. So, i ignore performance from now.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 530
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 13:18
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Isn't there a way to provide a binary with timing log enabled for him to run?
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Nope, rendering is done in parallel, time between functions call doesnt matter.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 12 Sep 2012, 21:48
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Dont' know if can help, anyway modded:ENBSeries wrote:https://imgur.com/a/e2WDG
This is what i have from bridge, with mod enabled. Without it Steam fps counter shows 46 fps. I cant see difference without high end videocard. So, i ignore performance from now.
Enabled
https://imgur.com/ySvwbcd
Disabled
https://imgur.com/TfbUqtv
System: System : i7-7700k, 32gb ram, SSD drives, GTX 1080, Win10 Pro 1709.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 530
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 13:18
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
It's about having the mod installed (but disabled) vs not having the mod enabled.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Darkgondul
You need to test this with mod removed completely, using fps counter from Steam overlay, f.e.
You need to test this with mod removed completely, using fps counter from Steam overlay, f.e.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 12 Sep 2012, 21:48
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Sorry Boris, I don't want to be silly, but Overlay can't capture the fps (my problem with steam plus win10), tried few solution without a result, so I used Fraps for the vanilla run, anyway, I can confirm the frames showed:ENBSeries wrote:Darkgondul
You need to test this with mod removed completely, using fps counter from Steam overlay, f.e.
With the Enb effects on
https://imgur.com/DsAdll2
With the Enb effects off
https://imgur.com/9p2Hdc4
(FPS limiter disabled of course)
Without the Enb
https://imgur.com/wBHIQPA
Fresh install without any mod.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17559
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: TES Skyrim SE 0.325
Well, then i cant do anything unless prices for videocards will not drop back.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7