Fallout 3

[midhras]

Okay, okay. So ambient lighting CAN do a lot for a shot. WHY did nobody tell me this?

[Rubber-De-Flubber]

So that's where you've been for these past 4 days, making sure your camera didn't leave the Ghoul. (Hope you packed lots of water and food!)

[midhras]

I've been tweaking along busily. I was trying to solve some problems, and then created a couple more. You have to love tweaking (or go mad). Boris got me thinking, and in the end I think I went with exactly the opposite of what he was trying to make clear. Hey! What can you do?

[midhras]

[Rubber-De-Flubber]

@Midhras
Whoa, which grass mod is that?

Edit: Just looked back at your previous screenshots and now I feel silly for not noticing earlier.

[midhras]

It's a bit of Vurt. From different worlds.

[Rubber-De-Flubber]

We're doing Ghoul screenshots, right?

[midhras]

Quite nice Flubber. That suit is going to get soiled.



Okay, I need you people.
I'm tweaking like crazy, and I have a couple choices to make (or optionals to include with my release). I currently have two enbeffect.fx files, which use different approaches to render the image. One uses a tweaked version of postprocessing method 2 (PP2) and the other a heavily edited PP3.

I kind of like them both. But I want to know if you all think both are viable options. I'll share some more shots (exteriors) later.

You can see both images below, but there is also an onmouseover screenshot comparison here. PP2 loads first, and PP3 is shown when you hover the mouse over the image. Please consider voicing your opinion.

PP2:


PP3:

[Rubber-De-Flubber]

I really enjoy both, the first one is nice and sharp, but darker, and with a nice yellow tone. But the second one is nice and soft, but lighter, with a nice peach colour. It's a really tough decision, I'd say release both.

(And if you don't mind me asking, how do you people code these things? What languages, where'd you learn, etc. )

[midhras]