SFO 2.0 + Dark Fantasy Overhaul + Unbelievable grass... here's a link sites.google.com/site/aceeqmodding/dark-fantasy-edition
TES Skyrim
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 572
- Joined: 23 Aug 2013, 21:59
- Location: United States
Re: TES Skyrim
Groteslav Refrost I'll save prod the trouble and repost what he already put on flickr
-
Offline
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 02 Nov 2014, 07:30
- Location: Russia
Re: TES Skyrim
Jafin16 wrote:Groteslav Refrost I'll save prod the trouble and repost what he already put on flickr
SFO 2.0 + Dark Fantasy Overhaul + Unbelievable grass... here's a link sites.google.com/site/aceeqmodding/dark-fantasy-edition
Thank you so much
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37
Re: TES Skyrim
*sniff*Jafin16 wrote:CruNcher
Krista was banned a few weeks back...
Very sad to hear that could you point me to where and why it happened and Boris decided todo so ?
@prod80
Results are additionally supersampled right ?
@Boris
Sorry for that 2 picture they should only showcase a problem with the texture approach
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE
Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 996
- Joined: 02 Jan 2014, 23:38
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 28 Jul 2013, 23:26
Re: TES Skyrim
CruNcher
No, not additionally. They are supersampled from the get go, and the shots from last page bottom are also edited on per shot basis...
Like this one
In this image I edited the game fog using setfog command, edited white level for exposure of the scene, shot it at 4860x3240 and cropped out a 21:9 AR in post. No other edits where done. Image would look the same if I would of done that using my native resolution just it would show aliasing.
No, not additionally. They are supersampled from the get go, and the shots from last page bottom are also edited on per shot basis...
Like this one
In this image I edited the game fog using setfog command, edited white level for exposure of the scene, shot it at 4860x3240 and cropped out a 21:9 AR in post. No other edits where done. Image would look the same if I would of done that using my native resolution just it would show aliasing.
-
Offline
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 07 Oct 2014, 19:49
Re: TES Skyrim
@prod: Impressive, is that your latest serenity enb?
@Ohkay: I really like the first shot.
@pfuscher: You always post nice textures but every enb you were using looks...not that good. Sry no offense but the sharpening and extreme brightness makes the vegetation look bad.
@Cruncher: I was so annoyed by the nude Krista body shots at some point it was creepy how fixated some people were. I mean every page that one naked woman with dozen of shots.
@Ohkay: I really like the first shot.
@pfuscher: You always post nice textures but every enb you were using looks...not that good. Sry no offense but the sharpening and extreme brightness makes the vegetation look bad.
@Cruncher: I was so annoyed by the nude Krista body shots at some point it was creepy how fixated some people were. I mean every page that one naked woman with dozen of shots.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 996
- Joined: 02 Jan 2014, 23:38
Re: TES Skyrim
No problem 
Trying to improve. Sharpening is deactivated now, but vegetation still looks not optimal due to aliasing. enb edge antialiasing would fix it, but it kinda blurs as far as I remember.
So far it has been sharpshooter, realvision and tk extended, I'm not contend with any of those either, but I'm still trying
I also got a pretty old lcd monitor, which could also be a problem. I just won't get skyrim running with enough fps, although I did everything to optimize performance.
Trying to improve. Sharpening is deactivated now, but vegetation still looks not optimal due to aliasing. enb edge antialiasing would fix it, but it kinda blurs as far as I remember.
So far it has been sharpshooter, realvision and tk extended, I'm not contend with any of those either, but I'm still trying
I also got a pretty old lcd monitor, which could also be a problem. I just won't get skyrim running with enough fps, although I did everything to optimize performance.
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 28 Jul 2013, 23:26
Re: TES Skyrim
How can you not have FPS using a GTX970. Something is seriously messed up on your system... You should easily pull 45+ FPS using RealVision (which isn't performance heavy by a very long shot) using uGrids 7 or 9 with a buttload of highres textures.
Or what is the rest of your system. I have i5 2500K as well, though OC to 4.7Ghz... only 8GB CAS7 1600Mhz and no SSD using GTX680 I get 35 FPS on RealVision. For reverence I get 17-20 FPS using Serenity with my silly ini tweaks of lately.
Or what is the rest of your system. I have i5 2500K as well, though OC to 4.7Ghz... only 8GB CAS7 1600Mhz and no SSD using GTX680 I get 35 FPS on RealVision. For reverence I get 17-20 FPS using Serenity with my silly ini tweaks of lately.
Last edited by prod80 on 02 Nov 2014, 21:57, edited 1 time in total.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 996
- Joined: 02 Jan 2014, 23:38
Re: TES Skyrim
That's the question :/
Maybe scripts or unclean mods. That's the only thing I haven't checked.
On the other side, nobody has as much 4k textures as I do, as I haven't uploaded everything.
And I also got a lot of grass, plants and trees.
Maybe scripts or unclean mods. That's the only thing I haven't checked.
On the other side, nobody has as much 4k textures as I do, as I haven't uploaded everything.
And I also got a lot of grass, plants and trees.
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 28 Jul 2013, 23:26
Re: TES Skyrim
Scripted mods do not cause this kind of FPS drops you have... Skyrimprefs.ini tweaks and lotta flora at high res does. Would start a small troubleshooting track if I were you around those 2 items. With that card you should be able to pull 3840x2160 res at still around 15-20 FPS and have no more issues with aliasing... for gameplay that's a bit to little but for screenshots it is a LOT better.