TES Skyrim 0.195

[CruNcher]

[MEMORY]
ExpandSystemMemoryX64=true
ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=false
DisableDriverMemoryManager=true
EnableUnsafeMemoryHacks=false

ctd @ riverwood entrance so some steps further into then the ctd occured before

Helgen Keep had some of it's bottleneck scenes back that where much better handled latency wise with ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=true




Page faults where extremely higher almost 3x as high as with ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=true

that surely explains the not so good latency and the bottlenecks

[charlievoviii]

Jesus CRUNCHER please crop your picture. Don't be lazy... Also we have a Gallery section for posting gaming picture. Go and show off there.

[ENBSeries]

arsil
You wrong, dof shader from K ENB don't allow dynamic changes of that variable, like all others existing.

[skysan4298]

For my AMD 7850 2GB, only x64 flag to true was stable. Even with this setting, v0.195 appears to be much smoother as I ran. A good progress my point of view.
ExpandSystemMemoryX64=true
ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=false
DisableDriverMemoryManager=false
EnableUnsafeMemoryHacks=false

When I had T, F, T, T, panning camera side to side was quite stuttering at half stump tree next to Riften Snow-shod farm.

When I had T, F, T, F, a micro stuttering at same place but got the R6025 pure virture call error when trying to exit the game. I had to TaskMgr to get rid of black screen by killing Skyrim.

T, F, F, F had much less stutter than T, F, T, F.

[KuroTenshi]

Boris

Maybe I am annoying, but I am wondering if it'll be not a good idea to add (in a future version) an optimized Motion Blur as extra effect.
With this quite beautiful effect, it would be possible to use adaptive quality without perceptive visual loss during fast camera moves.

P.S : Sorry for advance for the dirty trick

[CruNcher]

Got one ctd too with that latest, looked like it did on first cell load after starting to move. but not 100% sure :>
Could not repeat it thou,atleast not yet :?

this is definitely the most stable on my Nvidia Intel system

though it shows the severe bottleneck issues in interiors (mostly on portals but also other places), but it didn't ctd for a much much longer period
so the question is now what option or which combination now keeps the ctd away and the bottlenecks on the lowest level (page faults)

also took some very nice shoots of the details i was able to render with this on my rather limited system (at least compared to many others here )
will post them in the Gallery

[MEMORY]
ExpandSystemMemoryX64=true
ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=false
DisableDriverMemoryManager=false
EnableUnsafeMemoryHacks=false

[djuplift]

Updated to this and I am using Real Vision Beta 195 from Nexus..

Still getting Black Screen/Freeze and an occasional CTD but not as often as other ENB's.

Heavily modded with HD textures, used the texture compression tool on them though.. can't tell if that actually helps or not..

i7 3770K @4.6GHZ 2xAsus 660Ti TOP cards in SLI @5040x1050 Resolution.. (nvidia surround)

Frame rate is all over the place 15-60 FPS..

[CruNcher]

NO CTD (super stable)

[MEMORY]
ExpandSystemMemoryX64=true
ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=false
DisableDriverMemoryManager=false
EnableUnsafeMemoryHacks=false


CTD (Better Performance due to lower Page Faults)

[MEMORY]
ExpandSystemMemoryX64=true
ReduceSystemMemoryUsage=true
DisableDriverMemoryManager=false
EnableUnsafeMemoryHacks=false

[Nightasy]

@Boris - With ReduceSystemMemoryUsage set to true I get major in game frame stutters when running around in exterior areas. I only just now am reporting this due to having had taken a break from Skyrim over the past few weeks. Not sure if this is a known issue, unknown issue or just an issue specific to my custom preset. Setting it to false completely fixes the frame stutters.

[Oyama]

Boris
Simple question :
are " -1 " quality values available for each effect actually ?

If not, I have a personal request : (won't be surprising coming from me )
I don't know the hell how your algorythms are actually working, but :

Can you make " -1 " quality level available for each quality var if they aren't yet ?
Can you set a " -2 " value for extreme quality for effects that would benefit from it ?
Do you have enough wide range in computations for the effects to yet increase their quality ?

On powerful rigs, performance differences between 0 and -1 is not that heavy, I would sign for a "no prisoner" extreme quality setting right away.