GTA 5 beta 0.270

Forum rules
new topics are not allowed in this subsection, only replies.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar
*master*
Posts: 134
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 12:39
Location: Gdynia

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

Ok, I tested more the version 0.270 of ENB and I have some fps drops.

with ENB
Image
and without
Image
5fps less...

with ENB
Image
and without
Image
no drop

with ENB
Image
and without
Image
almost 3fps less

with ENB
Image
and without
Image
4fps less

with ENB
Image
and without
Image

It looks like I have about 10% fps less.

And I think "fix Moon" general doesn't work
Image
Last edited by robi29 on 29 May 2015, 17:47, edited 1 time in total.
_________________
CPU: Ryzen 7 5800x MOBO: X570 Aorus Elite GPU: Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC RAM: Ballistix 2x16GB 3600MHz CL16 SSD: Aorus 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 NVMe TV: LG OLED C9 55"

My settings for GTA V
Like it on Facebook

Offline
Posts: 96
Joined: 21 Sep 2014, 09:04
Location: Somewhere

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

robi29
I have the same issue. Maybe it's because we both have relatively weak CPUs? I've compared mine and yours with one of the internet-services, but not sure if it is true. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-2 ... MD-FX-8320
_________________
AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5Ghz OCed, DDR3 4GB@1600mhz CL9, ASUS Radeon R9 290x DirectCUII, Win7 x64.

Offline
User avatar
*master*
Posts: 134
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 12:39
Location: Gdynia

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

I don't think CPUs are problem. However the fps drops are a bit strange, because icelaglace has similar GPU as you, but certainly different CPU and no fps drops...


And "fix Moon" problem:
on
Image
off
Image

It seems the fix works like position of light is reflected vertically. I hope you all know what I mean.
_________________
CPU: Ryzen 7 5800x MOBO: X570 Aorus Elite GPU: Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC RAM: Ballistix 2x16GB 3600MHz CL16 SSD: Aorus 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 NVMe TV: LG OLED C9 55"

My settings for GTA V
Like it on Facebook

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 1509
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 08:37

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

robi29 wrote:I don't think CPUs are problem. However the fps drops are a bit strange, because icelaglace has similar GPU as you, but certainly different CPU and no fps drops...
Thats impossible there will be always overhead
Disabled the effect in-game and enabled it again and vice versa, nothing changed in terms of FPS.
Using latest Catalyst. Or maybe I didn't check carefully enough but I didn't notice a performance drop or if there is, it's very minimal then on my PC. :?
He just didn't noticed it doesn't mean automatically there is none ;)
CruNcher
In gta5 i dont' see anything good from txaa, it's just blur a lot (msaa already done that) and don't give result as proper temporal antialiasing. Any kind of temporal antialiasing can't be generic without very annoying artifacts, doesn't matter if it's driver level or application level, only game developers able to make the code without bugs (or if game very simple graphically, anybody can do). And there is no difference between driver level or what i do, exactly the same features and limits, drivers designed for different purposes.
Fully agree TXAA is not really efficient here in Rage it was much more efficient though for example in CryEngine/Crysis 3 or Disrupt/Watch_Dogs :)

Thats clear it needs to be optimized to the Engine but Nvidia is trying that adapting see for example MFAA it's results got way better since the last driver in GTA 5 :)

And i guess the flickering i see currently is based on the 30 fps edge im currently hovering @ Nvidia said MFAA just becomes active @ >40 FPS but that cant be right with what im seeing here it shouldn't (pulse) flicker @ 30 FPS (there should be way enough data for the reconstruction)
_________________
85% of graphics research is about who can finally make Sponza look good.
Jasper Bekkers EA/DICE

Perfection is the greatest enemy of photorealism.
Jorge Jimenez Activision Blizzard

Offline
User avatar
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 17549
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Location: Rather not to say

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

robi29
AMD videocard i suppose.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7

Offline
Posts: 8
Joined: 28 May 2015, 10:11

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

could anyone so kindly link me to the 0.270 resource as it is not readily available on the website...

Offline
Posts: 92
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 04:54

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

Doctorgta wrote:could anyone so kindly link me to the 0.270 resource as it is not readily available on the website...
That's because he updated the ENB to version 0.271 with more features, just use that one instead. Nice videos btw
_________________
CPU: Intel i5-2400 | GPU: GTX 660 | RAM: 8GB | OS: Windows 10 64-bit Preview build 10072 | Drivers: 350.12

Offline
Posts: 8
Joined: 28 May 2015, 10:11

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

RedFlamez wrote:
Doctorgta wrote:could anyone so kindly link me to the 0.270 resource as it is not readily available on the website...
That's because he updated the ENB to version 0.271 with more features, just use that one instead. Nice videos btw
thank you but if anyone could link me i cannot get this ENB Preset to work unless its with 0.270:/

Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
Posts: 659
Joined: 19 Jul 2013, 13:04

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

CruNcher wrote:
ENBSeries wrote:CruNcher
I don't see anything on you video or don't know what to look at. Also i very hate all driver hacks and never support them, they just add bugs on practice, rarely work fine.

Insomnia
I don't remember if auto logout time could be be increased, will check and set to bigger, if possible.

EDIT: done, from 30 mins to 1.5 hours autologout time increased.



I said my words about Witcher 3 many times, it is not worth modding, because it buggy like hell and i'm not robot to develop mods again and again for every game patch. Nobody loading mods for "old" games, f.e. my updates to Deus Ex 3 do not increase download rate, so i don't bother doing anything non-pop. This is bad, i know, but it's reality.
Boris hacks ?

It's Nvidias research and they will always have lower level access to the hardware then anyone of us will ever have so it is still the most performant way to include features that are near to the WDDM and fastest way to access the Framebuffer ;)

The Video shows a part of how MFAA works on the Transparency AA level (enhancing MSAA 2x to 4x without huge Performance (latency) increase adaptively and lower VRAM usage) so basically it shows Nvidias ongoing low level latency Driver Temporal AA Research :)
Since TXAA and the leaving of Timothy Lottes (FXAA/TXAA) to Epic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzpLWzGvFK4

Maybe indeed you should really think of a more lower level ENB closer to the Kernel as a Driver instead of a Hook on the Higher DX API level :)

once again speaking out from his ass.
_________________
W10*I7 6700K*MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium*2x Titan X Pascal*32GB 3600mhz DDR4* 3x 512GB Samsung Pro SSD*ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
ENBSeries wrote: Welcome to AMD world! Don't complains to me, you bought it, have a nice time.

Offline
*master*
Posts: 113
Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 11:18

Re: GTA 5 beta 0.270

Doctorgta wrote:could anyone so kindly link me to the 0.270 resource as it is not readily available on the website...
Hope is not too late... here is a mirror for 0.270 http://www95.zippyshare.com/v/6f9A44kA/file.html
Post Reply